4.6 Article

Comparing Catalysts of the Direct Synthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide in Organic Solvent: is the Measure of the Product an Issue?

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages 2653-2663

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202100306

Keywords

Hydrogen Peroxide; Direct Synthesis; Titrimetric Analysis; Permanganometry; Spectrophotometric Analysis

Funding

  1. University of Padova, BIRD project PDiSC [03BIRD2020-UNIPD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares various methods for measuring hydrogen peroxide concentration and highlights the pros and cons to provide guidance for researchers in selecting the best analysis method in the context of direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide. These methods can assist in comparing catalytic results assessed in different ways.
The direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide has been for about 20 years a hot topic in green catalysis. Several methods, which are well established to measure the concentration of hydrogen peroxide in water are also applied to the analysis of reaction mixtures from the direct synthesis of H2O2. However, this step could not be always straightforward, because these mixtures contain almost invariably organic solvents and, sometimes, selectivity enhancers which can interfere in some, at the least, of the most popular titrimetric methods. This work presents a comparative investigation of iodometry, cerimetry, permanganometry (titrimetric methods) and spectrophotometric analysis of Ti-IV/H2O2 adduct, as applied to analysis of hydrogen peroxide produced by its direct synthesis. They account for more than 90 % of the competent literature since 2000. Their pros and cons are highlighted to provide a guideline for the choice of the best possible method of analysis and for the comparison of catalytic results assessed in different ways in the context of the direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available