4.4 Review

Photophobia in migraine: A symptom cluster?

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 41, Issue 11-12, Pages 1240-1248

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03331024211014633

Keywords

photophobia; migraine; pattern glare; flicker; colour contrast

Funding

  1. NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [26282]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R15 AREA 122935]
  3. NSF EPSCoR grant [1632849]
  4. Wellcome Trust [206619/Z/17/Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses photophobia in migraine and suggests that a cortical mechanism may provide a parsimonious explanation for discomfort from various forms of visual stimulation. Future research comparing retinal and cortical contributions to photophobia in migraine may help identify biomarkers and treatment mechanisms.
Photophobia is one of the most common symptoms in migraine, and the underlying mechanism is uncertain. The discovery of the intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells which signal the intensity of light on the retina has led to discussion of their role in the pathogenesis of photophobia. In the current review, we discuss the relationship between pain and discomfort leading to light aversion (traditional photophobia) and discomfort from flicker, patterns, and colour that are also common in migraine and cannot be explained solely by the activity of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. We argue that, at least in migraine, a cortical mechanism provides a parsimonious explanation for discomfort from all forms of visual stimulation, and that the traditional definition of photophobia as pain in response to light may be too restrictive. Future investigation that directly compares the retinal and cortical contributions to photophobia in migraine with that in other conditions may offer better specificity in identifying biomarkers and possible mechanisms to target for treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available