4.7 Article

3D-printable engineered cementitious composites (3DP-ECC): Fresh and hardened properties

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106388

Keywords

3D printing; Self-reinforced; Engineered cementitious composite; Rheology; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
  2. College of Engineering
  3. Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning's Prototyping Tomorrow Grant Initiative
  4. University of Michigan MCubed 3.0

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research focuses on developing a printable cement composite material to replace steel reinforcement for 3D concrete printing. Results show that the interface between printed layers is strengthened by a groove-tongue joint, improving the strength of the printed structure.
3D printing (3DP) is an emerging digital construction method for concrete materials. A major impediment to efficient 3D concrete printing (3DCP) is the need for steel reinforcement, the placement of which is incompatible with the 3DP process. Unlike plain concrete, ductile self-reinforced engineered cementitious composite (ECC) holds promise to remove the dependence on steel reinforcement. The objective of this research is to develop a 3D-printable ECC (3DP-ECC). The fresh rheological and hardened mechanical properties of 3DP-ECC are investigated. The robotically printed tensile specimens demonstrated the familiar multiple microcracking and strain-hardening behavior of conventionally cast ECC. Significant orthotropy is revealed in the compressive properties. The interface between printed layers is found to be toughened by a printed groove-tongue joint. The developed 3DP-ECC was used to print a twisted column with 150 layers, reaching a height of 1.5 m. This research lays the groundwork for efficient robotically 3D-printed structures of complex shapes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available