4.7 Article

Fiber orientation effects on ultra-high performance concrete formed by 3D printing

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106384

Keywords

Fiber orientation; 3D printing; Ultra-high performance concrete; Mechanical properties; Image analysis

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LE170100168, DP210101680, DE180101587]
  2. Australian Research Council [DE180101587] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantitatively investigated the orientation distribution of steel fibers in 3D printed ultra-high performance concrete, revealing that smaller nozzle size and higher fiber volume fraction significantly improved fiber alignment parallel to printing direction, resulting in superior mechanical performance of the printed specimens compared to mold-cast specimens.
Despite the growing interest in 3D concrete printing, its current progress is limited by reinforcing methods. Inclusion of steel fibers is a potential reinforcing solution; however, the effect of printing process on orientation of the fibers is still unknown. This study aims to quantitatively investigate the orientation distribution of steel fibers in 3D printed ultra-high performance concrete. The effects of extrusion nozzle size, Cartesian print speed, and fiber volume fraction on the orientation of fibers were evaluated using digital image analysis. The consequent effects of the fiber orientation on the mechanical properties of the 3D-printed specimens were also determined. The results were compared with those of the conventionally mold-cast specimens. The results revealed that the smaller nozzle size and higher fiber volume fraction significantly enhanced the fiber alignment parallel to the printing direction. This preferential fiber alignment led to superior mechanical performance of the printed specimens to the mold-cast specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available