4.7 Article

ER residential chaperone GRP78 unconventionally relocalizes to the cell surface via endosomal transport

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 78, Issue 12, Pages 5179-5195

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-021-03849-z

Keywords

Endoplasmic reticulum stress; Unconventional trafficking; Endosome; GRP78

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA027607, R01 CA027607-37S1]
  2. Judy and Larry Freeman Chair in Basic Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research has revealed that ER chaperones such as GRP78 can escape from the ER and traffic to the cell surface in colon and lung cancer via a non-traditional endosomal transport pathway mediated by Rab GTPases. This unconventional translocation mechanism is driven by membrane fusion between ER-derived vesicles and endosomes, requiring specific SNARE proteins and co-chaperones regulated by ER stress-induced signaling pathways.
Despite new advances on the functions of ER chaperones at the cell surface, the translocation mechanisms whereby these chaperones can escape from the ER to the cell surface are just emerging. Previously we reported that in many cancer types, upon ER stress, IRE1 alpha binds to and triggers SRC activation resulting in KDEL receptor dispersion from the Golgi and suppression of retrograde transport. In this study, using a combination of molecular, biochemical, and imaging approaches, we discovered that in colon and lung cancer, upon ER stress, ER chaperones, such as GRP78 bypass the Golgi and unconventionally traffic to the cell surface via endosomal transport mediated by Rab GTPases (Rab4, 11 and 15). Such unconventional transport is driven by membrane fusion between ER-derived vesicles and endosomes requiring the v-SNARE BET1 and t-SNARE Syntaxin 13. Furthermore, GRP78 loading into ER-derived vesicles requires the co-chaperone DNAJC3 that is regulated by ER-stress induced PERK-AKT-mTOR signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available