4.7 Article

Adenine base editing and prime editing of chemically derived hepatic progenitors rescue genetic liver disease

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1614-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2021M3A9H3015389, 2021M3A9H3015390]
  2. Medical Research Center [2017R1A5A2015395]
  3. Basic Science Research Program [2019R1F1A106114812]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021M3A9H3015390, 4199990313975] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA base editors and prime editing technology can be used for in situ correction of disease-causing alleles, with CdHs being a multipotent cell population with potential for treating genetic liver diseases.
DNA base editors and prime editing technology enable therapeutic in situ correction of disease-causing alleles. These techniques could have broad applications for ex vivo editing of cells prior to transplantation in a range of diseases, but it is critical that the target population is efficiently modified and engrafts into the host. Chemically derived hepatic progenitors (CdHs) are a multipotent population capable of robust engraftment and hepatocyte differentiation. Here we reprogrammed hepatocytes from a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 (HT1) into expandable CdHs and successfully corrected the disease-causing mutation using both adenine base editors (ABEs) and prime editors (PEs). ABE- and PE-corrected CdHs repopulated the liver with fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase-positive cells and dramatically increased survival of mutant HT1 mice. These results demonstrate the feasibility of precise gene editing in transplantable cell populations for potential treatment of genetic liver disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available