4.7 Article

Helicobacter pylori CagA elicits BRCAness to induce genome instability that may underlie bacterial gastric carcinogenesis

Journal

CELL HOST & MICROBE
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 941-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.04.006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEXT/JSPS, Japan [19K07535, 16H06373, 16K15273]
  2. AMED, Japan [160200000291]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infection with CagA-producing H. pylori leads to gastric cancer development through disrupting DNA repair mechanisms, inhibiting apoptosis of damaged cells, and promoting somatic mutation. This hit-and-run mechanism creates a favorable environment for the initiation and progression of gastric carcinogenesis.
Infection with CagA-producing Helicobacter pylori plays a causative role in the development of gastric cancer. Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA deregulates prooncogenic phosphatase SHP2 while inhibiting polarity-regulating kinase PAR1b through complex formation. Here, we show that CagA/PAR1b interaction subverts nuclear translocation of BRCA1 by inhibiting PAR1b-mediated BRCA1 phosphorylation. It hereby induces BRCAness that promotes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) while disabling error-free homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair. The CagA/PAR1b interaction also stimulates Hippo signaling that circumvents apoptosis of DNA-damaged cells, giving cells time to repair DSBs through error-prone mechanisms. The DSB-activated p53-p21(Cip1) axis inhibits proliferation of CagA-delivered cells, but the inhibition can be overcome by p53 inactivation. Indeed, sequential pulses of CagA in TP53-mutant cells drove somatic mutation with BRCAness-associated genetic signatures. Expansion of CagA-delivered cells with BRCAness-mediated genome instability, from which CagA-independent cancer-predisposing cells arise, provides a plausible hit-and-run mechanism of H. pylori CagA for gastric carcinogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available