4.1 Article

Risk assessment in deferred and recovered donors

Journal

CELL AND TISSUE BANKING
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 623-629

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-021-09909-9

Keywords

Tissue Donation; Donor Risk Assessment Interview (DRAI) screening; Serologic testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of serologic testing and Donor Risk Assessment Interview (DRAI) has made tissue transplantation a frequent and safe modality. A study found that DRAI screening defers most, but not all, potential serologically reactive donors, highlighting the need for both screening and testing to ensure transplantation safety.
Serologic testing and Donor Risk Assessment Interview (DRAI) combined have made tissue transplantation a frequent and safe modality for a variety of trauma and disease conditions. Donate Life America reports 30,000 tissue donors providing more than 1,750,000 tissue transplants annually. This study of 188 potential donor cases addresses issues of risk assessment in a medical examiner population in a metropolitan area, where serologic testing of deferred potential donors were compared with the DRAI screening, which determined the suitability or non-suitability for tissue procurement. Such serologic testing of deferred cases is not usually available in evaluating screening processes. This comparison gives insight into the effectiveness of the DRAI screening in deferring potential serology reactive donors. Results show in 65 cases how the DRAI screening eliminates most, but not all of the serologically reactive donors identified post recovery. The result emphasizes the need for the combined process of DRAI screening and testing to assure transplantation safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available