4.8 Article

SARS-CoV-2 evolution in an immunocompromised host reveals shared neutralization escape mechanisms

Journal

CELL
Volume 184, Issue 10, Pages 2605-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the NIH [P30 GM124165]
  2. NIH-ORIP HEI grant [S10 RR029205]
  3. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness (MassCPR)
  5. China Evergrande Group
  6. Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
  7. Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness
  8. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM007753]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that mutations occurring during the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 virus may lead to resistance against antibodies, posing challenges to long-term efficacy.
Many individuals mount nearly identical antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2. To gain insight into how the viral spike (S) protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) might evolve in response to common antibody responses, we studied mutations occurring during virus evolution in a persistently infected immunocompromised individual. We use antibody Fab/RBD structures to predict, and pseudotypes to confirm, that mutations found in late-stage evolved S variants confer resistance to a common class of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies we isolated from a healthy COVID-19 convalescent donor. Resistance extends to the polyclonal serum immunoglobulins of four out of four healthy convalescent donorswe tested and to monoclonal antibodies in clinical use. We further show that affinity maturation is unimportant for wild-type virus neutralization but is critical to neutralization breadth. Because the mutations we studied foreshadowed emerging variants that are now circulating across the globe, our results have implications to the long-term efficacy of S-directed countermeasures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available