4.7 Article

The hollow core-shell ferric oxide entrapped chitosan microcapsules as phosphate binders for phosphorus removal in vitro

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117621

Keywords

Hyperphosphatemia; Chitosan microcapsule; Hydrophobic ferric oxide; Pickering emulsion; Phosphate binder

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [201602185]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China [DUT20LK43]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fe@CH microcapsules, with enhanced phosphate binding and limited iron leakage, are a proper candidate as the phosphate binder for hyperphosphatemia patients due to their improved bio-compatibility and binding efficacy.
Patients in hyperphosphatemia are orally prescribed with phosphate binders to excrete the non-metabolic phosphorus. Aiming for the bio-compatibility and binding efficacy, the Fe-based phosphate binders of low toxicity have been explored and improved. Herein, the hollow core-shell microcapsules as Fe@CH (nano ferric oxide entrapped in the polymerized chitosan) were constructed via emulsion interface polymerization, to enhance the phosphate binding from -NH2 group and iron complex, and limit iron leakage significantly. Via the double emulsion polymerization based on the primary Pickering emulsion stabilized by oleic acid-modified ferric oxide, Fe@CH performed as the rough polymerized-chitosan microcapsules entrapping well-distributed ferric oxide for the phosphate adsorption in vitro. At pH 3 and pH 5, Fe@CH bound phosphorus efficiently, with the capacity of 55 mg/g and 65 mg/g respectively, along with the excellent shell isolation from iron leakage and remarkable safety. Prospectively, the Fe@CH micro-sorbent is the proper candidate as the phosphate binder for hyperphosphatemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available