4.4 Article

Prognostic role of pretreatment lung immune prognostic index in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy

Journal

CANCER BIOMARKERS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 177-185

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-201502

Keywords

Small-cell lung cancer; biomarker; LIPI score; prognostic index

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that in ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy, those with a pretreatment LIPI score of 2 had a poorer prognosis compared to those with a LIPI score of 0-1. Further research is recommended to validate these findings in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic role of lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients treated with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy. METHODS: Data were obtained from two randomized controlled trials (NCT00119613 and NCT00363415). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed according to LIPI score through Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed to investigate predictors for OS and PFS. RESULTS: A total of 911 patients with ES-SCLC treated with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy (CT) were included for analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years, and 760 (83.4%) had performance status of 1 or less. 1-year OS for ES-SCLC with poor, intermediate, and good LIPI was 20%, 30% and 31%, respectively, and 1-year PFS was 7%, 15% and 21%, respectively. Cox-regression analysis showed that the PFS and OS of ES-SCLC with a poor LIPI score was significantly worse than those with good LIPI scores (HR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.38-2.36; p < 0.001 and HR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.07-1.72, p = 0.012), while no significant difference was observed between intermediate and poor LIPI groups in terms of OS (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.82-1.23, p = 0.82), but not for PFS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00-1.61, p = 0.048). In addition, LIPI score was significantly associated with disease control rate and objective response rate (both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prognosis of patients with pretreatment LIPI score of 2 is poorer than those with LIPI score of 0-1 among ES-SCLC who received first-line platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy; Further studies are still recommended to confirm our findings in prospective studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available