Journal
BREAST
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 18-25Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.01.006
Keywords
Metastatic breast cancer; Prognostic factors; Real-life; Heavily pretreated; Chemotherapy
Categories
Funding
- RD UNICANCER
- Roche
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- MSD
- Eisai
- Daiichi Sankyo
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to identify predictive factors of outcome after third-or fourth-line chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients. Factors such as PFS, number of metastatic sites, and metastasis-free interval were found to influence overall survival, with prognostic nomograms achieving a moderate level of accuracy.
Purpose: Among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, those with a triple-negative breast cancer phenotype (mTNBC) have the worst prognosis, but the benefit of chemotherapy beyond second line on outcome remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to identify predictive factors of outcome after third-or fourth-line chemotherapy. Methods: The ESME-MBC database is a French prospective real-life cohort with homogeneous data collection, including patients who initiated first-line treatment for MBC (2008-2016) in 18 cancer centers. After selection of mTNBC cases, we searched for independent predictive factors (Cox proportional-hazards regression models) for overall survival (OS) on third-and fourth-line chemotherapy (OS3, OS4). We built prognostic nomograms based on the main prognostic factors identified. Results: Of the 22,266 MBC cases in the ESME cohort, 2903 were mTNBC, 1074 (37%) and 598 (20%) of which had received at least 3 or 4 lines of chemotherapy. PFS after first-and second-line chemotherapy (PFS1, PFS2) and number of metastatic sites >3 at baseline were identified by multivariate analysis as prognostic factors for both OS3 (HR = 0.76 95%CI[0.66-0.88], HR = 0.55 95%CI[0.46-0.65], HR = 1.36 95% CI[1.14-1.62], respectively), and OS4 (HR = 0.76 95%CI[0.63-0.91], HR = 0.56 95%CI[0.45-0.7], HR = 1.37 95%CI[1.07-1.74]), respectively. In addition, metastasis-free interval was identified as a prognostic factor for OS3 (p = 0.01), while PFS3 influenced OS4 (HR = 0.75 95%CI[0.57-0.98]). Nomograms predicting OS3 and OS4 achieved a C-index of 0.62 and 0.61, respectively.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available