4.6 Article

Self-adjustment of deep brain stimulation delays optimization in Parkinson's disease

Journal

BRAIN STIMULATION
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 676-681

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.04.001

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation; Parkinson disease; Surgery; Therapy; Programming

Funding

  1. Chair in Neuromodulation and Multidisciplinary care of University of Toronto, Canada
  2. University Health Network, Canada
  3. Medtronic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using the advanced functions of the patient programmer delays programming optimization and is associated with a higher number of side effects. Therefore, there is a need for other faster and safer stimulation programming methods.
Background: Parkinson's Disease patients undergo time-consuming programming to refine stimulation parameters after deep brain stimulation surgery. Objective: To assess whether the use of the advanced functions of a patient's programmer would facil-itate programming of deep brain stimulation. Methods: Thirty patients were randomly allocated to the use of advanced versus simple mode of the patient programmer in this single-centre, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Primary outcome was the number of days required to optimize the stimulation settings. Results: The number of days required to optimize stimulation was significantly lower in the simple mode (88.5 +/- 33.1 vs. 142.1 +/- 67.4, p = 0.01). In addition, the advanced mode group had a higher number of side effects (5.4 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.6 +/- 1.9, p = 0.0055). Conclusions: The use of the advanced functions of patient programmer delays programming optimiza-tion and it is associated with a higher number of side effects. These findings highlight the need for other methods for faster and safer stimulation programming. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available