4.6 Article

Prognostic significance of MUC2, CDX2 and SOX2 in stage II colorectal cancer patients

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08070-6

Keywords

Stage II colorectal cancer; Biomarkers; MUC2; CDX2; SOX2

Categories

Funding

  1. FEDER - Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 - Operacional Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation (POCI), Portugal 2020
  2. Portuguese funds through FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia/Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007274, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029017, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016390]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BD/146186/2019]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/146186/2019] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In stage II CRC patients, low MUC2 expression, in combination with high CDX2 expression, absence of SOX2 or MMR-proficiency, is associated with worse prognosis, while none of these biomarkers showed prognostic value overall. Patients with low MUC2 expression derived significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a serious health concern worldwide. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, about 15 to 30% of stage II CRC patients subjected to tumor resection with curative intent, develop disease relapse. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy adopted after surgery is not consensual for these patients. This supports the imperative need to find new prognostic and predictive biomarkers for stage II CRC. Methods For this purpose, we used a one-hospital series of 227 stage II CRC patient samples to assess the biomarker potential of the immunohistochemical expression of MUC2 mucin and CDX2 and SOX2 transcription factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival curves that were compared using the log-rank test, in order to determine prognosis of cases with different expression of these proteins, different mismatch repair (MMR) status and administration or not of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results In this stage II CRC series, none of the studied biomarkers showed prognostic value for patient outcome. However low expression of MUC2, in cases with high expression of CDX2, absence of SOX2 or MMR-proficiency, conferred a significantly worst prognosis. Moreover, cases with low expression of MUC2 showed a significantly clear benefit from treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion In conclusion, we observe that patients with stage II CRC with low expression of MUC2 in the tumor respond better when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This observation supports that MUC2 is involved in resistance to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and might be a promising future predictive biomarker in stage II CRC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available