4.4 Article

The neuropsychological outcome of pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy treated with VNS - A 24-month follow-up in Taiwan

Journal

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 95-98

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.12.030

Keywords

Vagus nerve stimulation; Seizures reduction; Parental Stress Index; Pediatric patients; Refractory epilepsy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Multiple studies have reported the benefits of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on neuropsychological outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate how VNS affects cognition and psychosocial adjustment in children with refractory epilepsy (RE), and to determine the efficacy of VNS in a Taiwanese population. Methods: We conducted a one-group pretest-posttest study on pediatric patients with RE. The study comprised 19 males and 18 females, all aged <18 years. Werecorded seizure frequency at 3, 12, and 24 months after VNS device implantation. Intelligence quotients (IQ) were assessed using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - IV. The Parental Stress Index (PSI) scores were evaluated by a pediatric psychologist. Results: Vagus nerve stimulation device implantation significantly reduced seizure frequency at 3, 12 and 24 months, especially in young children (<12 years). No significant improvement in IQ test performance was observed, though there were significant improvements in the PSI, especially in young children. Conclusions: Vagus nerve stimulation device implantation does not significantly improve cognition function, but it does significantly reduce seizure frequency and stress in parent-child relationships, especially in young children (<12 years). These findings suggest that VNS should be considered as an alternative therapy for patients proven to have seizures that are medically refractory, especially those younger than 12 years of age. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available