4.6 Article

Longitudinal follow-up and performance validation of an mRNA-based urine test (Xpert(R) Bladder Cancer Monitor) for surveillance in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages 713-721

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15418

Keywords

non‐ muscle‐ invasive bladder cancer; molecular diagnostic; liquid biopsy; surveillance; anticipatory positive; #blcsm; #BladderCancer; #uroonc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the performance of Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor as a predictor of tumor recurrence in NMIBC patients, showing high sensitivity and negative predictive value for high-grade cancer. Patients with positive Xpert but negative cystoscopy results have a higher risk of recurrence and require close surveillance.
Objective To evaluate the performance of the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor (Xpert; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) test as a predictor of tumour recurrence in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients and Methods Patients (n = 429) undergoing surveillance for NMIBC underwent Xpert, cytology, and UroVysion testing. Patients with a positive Xpert and a negative cystoscopy result (positive-negative [PN] group, n = 66) and a control group of double negative patients (negative Xpert and cystoscopy results [NN] group) were followed for 12 months (+/- 90 days). Results Histology-confirmed recurrences were detected in 58 patients (13.5%). Xpert had an overall sensitivity of 60.3% and a specificity of 76.5%. The sensitivity for high-grade (HG) cancer was 87% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. Urine cytology showed an overall sensitivity of 23.2% (47.6% sensitivity for HG tumours) and a specificity of 88.3%. In the PN group, 32% (n = 21) developed a recurrence within 12 months, 11 of which were HG tumours. In the NN control group, 14% (n = 9) developed a recurrence and only two were HG tumours. The hazard ratio for developing recurrence in the PN group was 2.68 for all tumours and 6.84 for HG cancer. Conclusions The Xpert test has a high sensitivity for detecting the recurrence of cancer and a high NPV for excluding HG cancer. In addition, the data suggest that patients with a positive Xpert assay in the setting of negative cystoscopy are at high risk for recurrence and need close surveillance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available