4.8 Article

Hydraulic flow direction alters nutrients removal performance and microbial mechanisms in electrolysis-assisted constructed wetlands

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 325, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124692

Keywords

Electrolysis-assisted constructed wetland; Tertiary treatment; Hydraulic flow direction; Multi-path denitrification; Microbial community structure

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project for Water Pollution Control & Remediation of China [2012ZX07307-002]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Fuzhou University [GXRC-20076]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that an electrolysis-assisted down-flow constructed wetland (E-DFCW) can efficiently remove PO43-, NO3--N, and TN, leading to enhanced denitrification performance.
In this study, an electrolysis-assisted down-flow constructed wetland (E-DFCW) was successfully established, and achieved simultaneously efficient removal of PO43- (93.6% +/- 3.2%), NO3--N (97.1% +/- 2.0%) and TN (80.6% +/- 5.4%). When compared with electrolysis-assisted up-flow constructed wetland (E-UFCW), E-DFCW allowed significantly lower concentrations of PO43--P, NO3--N, total Fe and SO4--S in effluents. In addition, microbial community and functional genes prediction results indicated that hydraulic flow direction significantly altered microbial nitrogen, sulfur and carbon metabolisms in electrolysis-assisted constructed wetlands (E-CWs). Specifically, multi-path denitrification facilitated NO-N reduction in cathodic chamber of E-DFCW, whereas autohydrogenotrophic denitrification might dominate NO3--N reduction in cathodic chamber of E-UFCW. More abundant and diverse denitrifiers in cathodic chamber of E-DFCW contributed to enhanced denitrification performance. Overall, this work provides microbial insights into multi-path nitrogen metabolisms in electrolysis-assisted denitrification systems in response to hydraulic flow direction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available