4.7 Article

Non-classical cardenolides from Calotropis gigantea exhibit anticancer effect as HIF-1 inhibitors

Journal

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104740

Keywords

Calotropis gigantea; Cardenolide; Hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1); Anticancer

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR [0004/2019/A1, 0074/2019/AMJ, 0023/2019/AKP, 056/2013/A2]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study found that new non-classical cardenolides isolated from Calotropis gigantea not only showed inhibitory effect on HIF-1 transcriptional activity, but also exhibited selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells, suggesting their potential as candidate compounds for anticancer drugs.
Six new non-classical cardenolides (1-6), and seventeen known ones (7-23) were isolated from Calotropis gigantea. All cardenolides showed inhibitory effect on hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) transcriptional activity with IC50 of 8.85 nM-16.69 mu M except 5 and 7. The novel 19-dihydrocalotoxin (1) exhibited a comparable HIF-1 inhibitory activity (IC50 of 139.57 nM) to digoxin (IC50 of 145.77 nM), a well-studied HIF-1 inhibitor, and 11, 12, 14, 16 and 19 presented 1.4-15.4 folds stronger HIF-1 inhibition than digoxin. 1 and 11 showed a dosedependent inhibition on HIF-1 alpha protein, which led to their HIF-1 suppressing effects. Compared with LO2 and H9c2 normal cell lines, both 1 and 11 showed selective cytotoxicity against various cancer cell lines including HCT116, HeLa, HepG2, A549, MCF-7, A2780 and MDA-MB-231. Moreover, a comprehensive structure-activity relationship was concluded for these non-classical cardenolides as HIF-1 inhibitors, which may shed some light on the rational design and development of cardenolide-based anticancer drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available