4.7 Article

Activated carbon produced from bamboo and solid residue by CO2 activation utilized as CO2 adsorbents

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106039

Keywords

Bamboo; Physical activation; Activated carbon; Hydrothermal; CO2 adsorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bamboo and its solid residue were successfully converted into porous carbon through physical activation with CO2 agent, with the solid residue showing a higher potential due to its very low ash content. The activated carbon materials exhibited dominant microporous structures, with the highest BET surface area observed in the solid residue-derived carbon. The microporosity structure and CO2 adsorption capacity of the activated carbon could be enhanced under optimal CO2 activation conditions.
Bamboo and its solid residue after hydrothermal treatment were converted successfully into porous carbon by physical activation with the CO2 agent. The solid residue exhibits a higher potential to form activated carbon thanks to its very low ash content (almost 0%). The porosity and CO2 uptake of the carbon materials were characterized by the N-2 and CO2 adsorption/desorption techniques. The results showed a dominant microporous structure in the carbon derived from both bamboo and solid residue. The highest BET surface area that the carbon material from bamboo could achieve was 976 m(2) g(-1), meanwhile, this value at the carbon prepared from solid residue activated at the same temperature was 1496 m(2) g(-1). The microporosity structure of activated carbon could be stimulated and enhanced at the optimal condition of CO2 activation. The CO2 adsorption capacity of the carbon made from bamboo and the solid residue was also analyzed with good capacity (3.4 mmol g(-1)) comparing to the 3 reference materials at the same condition of adsorption (293 K, 1 atm).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available