4.4 Article

The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect in highly math-anxious individuals: An ERP study

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108062

Keywords

Math anxiety; SNARC effect; ERP/EEG; P3b; Working memory; Number comparison

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  2. European Regional Development Fund, FEDER [PSI2015-69915-R]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR2017-974, SGR2017-48, 2018FI-B-00346]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An ERP study on the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect revealed that individuals with high math anxiety (HMA) showed stronger SNARC effect but slower responses in incongruent trials for the largest numerical magnitudes. Additionally, HMAs exhibited a less positive centroparietal P3b component in incongruent trials, suggesting a greater difficulty in controlling conflicts between the automatically activated location of numbers in the mental number line and the response side in more cognitively demanding trials.
The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect was examined in highly (HMA) and low math-anxious (LMA) individuals performing a number comparison in an ERP study. The SNARC effect consists of faster latencies when the response side is congruent with number location in the mental number line (MNL). Despite the stronger SNARC effect in the HMA group, their responses in incongruent trials were slower than in congruent trials only for the largest numerical magnitudes. Moreover, HMAs showed a less positive centroparietal P3b component in incongruent trials than in congruent ones, but only for the largest magnitudes. Since the SNARC effect arises during response selection and P3b positivity decreases with the difficulty of decision, this result suggests that HMA individuals might find it more difficult than LMAs to control the conflict between the automatically activated location of numbers in the MNL and the response side, especially in more cognitively demanding trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available