4.7 Article

Detecting m6A methylation regions from Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 37, Issue 18, Pages 2818-2824

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab181

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [GM122083, GM124061, AG025688, GM103645, NS111602, MH116441, HG008935]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a novel statistical method is developed to identify mRNA epigenetic modification regions from MeRIP-seq data, based on an empirical Bayesian hierarchical model. This method accounts for various sources of variations in the data through rigorous modeling and applies shrinkage estimation by borrowing information from transcriptome-wide data to stabilize the parameter estimation, showing higher accuracy, robustness, and efficiency compared to existing peak calling methods in simulation and real data analyses.
Motivation: The post-transcriptional epigenetic modification on mRNA is an emerging field to study the gene regulatory mechanism and their association with diseases. Recently developed high-throughput sequencing technology named Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (MeRIP-seq) enables one to profile mRNA epigenetic modification transcriptome wide. A few computational methods are available to identify transcriptome-wide mRNA modification, but they are either limited by over-simplified model ignoring the biological variance across replicates or suffer from low accuracy and efficiency. Results: In this work, we develop a novel statistical method, based on an empirical Bayesian hierarchical model, to identify mRNA epigenetic modification regions from MeRIP-seq data. Our method accounts for various sources of variations in the data through rigorous modeling and applies shrinkage estimation by borrowing information from transcriptome-wide data to stabilize the parameter estimation. Simulation and real data analyses demonstrate that our method is more accurate, robust and efficient than the existing peak calling methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available