4.6 Article

Nitrogen cycling in tropical dry forests is sensitive to changes in rainfall regime and nitrogen deposition

Journal

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages 283-302

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-021-00788-6

Keywords

Drought; ENSO; N losses; N2O emissions; N-15 natural abundance; Mexico

Funding

  1. PAPIIT-UNAM [IN204313-3]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that semiarid forests had higher nitrogen concentrations in leaves and soil layers compared to subhumid forests, indicating a more open nitrogen cycle. Additionally, nitrous oxide emissions were twice as high in the semiarid site compared to the subhumid site, suggesting that rainfall amounts strongly affect nitrogen cycling in tropical dry forests.
The impacts of changes in rainfall regimes and atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition on the biogeochemical cycles of tropical dry forests (TDF) remain unclear. To analyze whether amounts of mean annual rainfall (1240 mm year(-1) in subhumid vs. 642 mm year(-1) in semiarid forests) and rates of atmospheric N deposition affect the N cycle in TDF, we examined N concentrations in (i) green leaves, (ii) forest floor and mineral soil layers, and (iii) soil microbial biomass, as well as (iv) delta N-15 natural abundance in green leaves and (v) rates of soil enzyme activity and (vi) N losses in two sites (one subhumid and another semiarid) of Yucatan. The semiarid site had higher N concentrations in leaves and both soil layers than its subhumid counterpart. Natural abundance delta N-15 in the vegetation suggests a more open N cycle with lower rates of rainfall, which was corroborated by N losses as nitrous oxide (N2O) being twice as high in the semiarid compared to subhumid site. A more open N cycle subject to greater losses in response to N addition in the semiarid site, but not in the subhumid site, reinforce that rainfall amounts strongly affect N cycling in TDF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available