4.6 Article

Effects of handling on the behavioural phenotype of the neuregulin 1 type III mouse model for

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 405, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113166

Keywords

Neuregulin 1 type III; Mouse model; Handling method; Schizophrenia; Behaviour; Gene-environment interaction

Funding

  1. WSU (Research Training Program on behalf of the Department of Education)
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) dementia research team initiative [1095215]
  3. NHMRC [1102012, 1141789, 1117079]
  4. Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation Ltd
  5. Ainsworth Medical Research Innovation Fund
  6. NSW Ministry of Health, Office of Health and Medical Research
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1141789, 1117079] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Handling methods significantly affect various behavioral domains, thus the impact of routine handling procedures should be considered when testing behavioral phenotypes. Handling did not alter the main schizophrenia-relevant characteristics of Nrg1 III tg mice but did affect the acoustic startle response in a genotype- and sex-specific manner. Future research should assess the effect of handling on other genetic models.
Handling of laboratory mice affects animal wellbeing and behavioural test outcomes. However, present research has focused on handling effects in common strains of laboratory mice despite the knowledge that environmental factors can modify established phenotypes of genetic mouse models. Thus, we examined the impact of handling on the face validity of a transgenic mouse model for the schizophrenia risk gene neuregulin 1 (i.e. Nrg1 type III overexpression). Nrg1 III tg and wild type-like (WT) control mice of both sexes underwent tail or tunnel handling before being assessed in the open field (OF), elevated plus maze (EPM), social preference/novelty, prepulse inhibition, and fear conditioning tests. Tunnel-handling reduced the startle response in all mice, increased OF locomotion and exploration in males and reduced anxiety in males (OF) and females (EPM) compared to tailhandling. Importantly, tunnel handling induced a more pronounced startle response to increasing startle stimuli in Nrg1 III tg females compared to respective controls, a phenomenon absent in tail-handled females. Finally, Nrg1 III tg males displayed reduced OF exploration and centre locomotion and Nrg1 III tg females displayed increased cue freezing over time compared to controls. In conclusion, handling methods have a significant impact on a variety of behavioural domains thus the impact of routine handling procedures need be considered when testing behavioural phenotypes. Handling did not change the main schizophrenia-relevant characteristics of Nrg1 III tg mice but affected the acoustic startle-response in a genotype- and sex-specific manner. Future research should evaluate the effect of handling on other genetic models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available