4.5 Article

Increased male mating success in the presence of prey and rivals in a sexually cannibalistic mantis

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 574-579

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab022

Keywords

competition; mantid; mating tactics; Miomantis caffra; prey availability; sexual cannibalism; sexual conflict

Funding

  1. Faculty Research Development Fund grant from the Faculty of Science, University of Auckland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that prey availability and male-male competition can affect mating behavior in the Springbok mantis, with matings occurring more frequently and rapidly in the presence of both prey and competitors. This suggests that male mating decisions are influenced by competition and the risk of cannibalism.
Precopulatory sexual cannibalism-or cannibalism without mating-is expected to promote the evolution of male strategies that enhance mating success and reduce the risk of cannibalism, such as preferentially approaching feeding females. Sexual selection on male competitiveness has the potential to alter male mating decisions in the face of cannibalism risk, but such effects are poorly understood. We investigated the effect of prey availability and male-male competition on mating incidence in the highly cannibalistic Springbok mantis, Miomantis caffra. We found that matings were initiated more rapidly and more often in the presence of prey, suggesting that females distracted with foraging may be less of a threat. Competition between males also hastened the onset of copulation and led to higher mating success, with very large effects occurring in the presence of both prey and competitors, indicating that intrasexual competition may intensify attraction to foraging females. Taken together, our results suggest that precopulatory cannibalism has selected for male preference for foraging females and that males adjust their mating strategy to both the risk of competition and the threat of cannibalism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available