4.7 Review

Technologies for safe and resilient earthmoving operations: A systematic literature review

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103632

Keywords

Technology innovation; Object detection; Earthmoving equipment; Excavation; System safety; Resilience engineering

Funding

  1. University College London, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resilience engineering pertains to a system's ability to anticipate, prepare for, and respond to disruptions, both predicted and unpredicted. This involves the use of monitoring and object detection technologies to ensure system safety, utilizing multisensory and data fusion approaches. The study also identifies functionalities for accident anticipation, prevention, response to safety hazards, and facilitating learning within the system.
Resilience engineering relates to the ability of a system to anticipate, prepare, and respond to predicted and unpredicted disruptions. It necessitates the use of monitoring and object detection technologies to ensure system safety in excavation systems. Given the increased investment and speed of improvement in technologies, it is necessary to review the types of technology available and how they contribute to excavation system safety. A systematic literature review was conducted which identified and classified the existing monitoring and object detection technologies, and introduced essential enablers for reliable and effective monitoring and object detection systems including: 1) the application of multisensory and data fusion approaches, and 2) system-level application of technologies. This study also identified the developed functionalities for accident anticipation, prevention and response to safety hazards during excavation, as well as those that facilitate learning in the system. The existing research gaps and future direction of research have been discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available