4.5 Article

Norovirus gastroenteritis outbreak transmitted by food and vomit in a high school

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 144, Issue 9, Pages 1951-1958

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268815003283

Keywords

Caliciviruses; epidemiology; Norwalk agent and related viruses; outbreaks; public health

Funding

  1. National Plan of I+D+I
  2. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion y Fomento de la Investigacion [PI09/02516]
  3. Fondo Europeo de Desarroollo Regional (FEDER)
  4. Fondo Europeo de Desarroollo Regional (Union Europea, Una manera de hacer Europa)
  5. Catalan Agency for the Management of Grants for University Research (AGAUR) [2014/SGR 1403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated an outbreak of norovirus that affected students and teachers of a high school in Lleida, Spain through various transmission mechanisms. A case-control epidemiological study of the risk of disease and the relative importance of each mode of transmission was carried out. Cases and controls were selected from a systematic sample of students and teachers present at the school on 28 January. Faecal samples were taken from three food handlers and 16 cases. The influence of each factor was studied using the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and the estimated population attributable risk (ePAR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We interviewed 210 people (42 cases, 168 controls). The proportion of symptoms in these individuals was nausea 786%, vomiting 595%, diarrhoea 452%, and fever 190%. The epidemic curve showed transmission for at least 4 days. The risk of disease was associated with exposure to food (aOR 58) in 661% of cases and vomit (aOR 47) in 248% of cases. Faecal samples from 11 patients and two food handlers were positive for norovirus GII.12 g. Vomit may co-exist with other modes of transmission in norovirus outbreaks and could explain a large number of cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available