4.6 Article

Reinforcing adherence to lipid-lowering therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 323, Issue -, Pages 37-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.03.013

Keywords

Acute coronary syndromes; Dyslipidemia; LDL-C goal; Medication adherence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate whether an educational-motivational intervention can improve long-term lipid-lowering therapy adherence and LDL-C goal attainment rate in post-ACS patients. The results showed that the intervention group had higher medication adherence and a positive correlation between good adherence and LDL-C goal achievement rate at one year.
Background and aims: Achieving the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a milestone often missed due to suboptimal adherence to secondary prevention treatments. Whether improved adherence could result in reduced LDL-C levels is unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether an educational-motivational intervention increases long-term lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) adherence and LDL-C goal attainment rate among post-ACS patients. Methods: IDEAL-LDL was a parallel, two-arm, single-center, pragmatic, investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial. Hospitalized patients for ACS were randomized to a physician-led integrated intervention consisting of an educational session at baseline, followed by regular motivational interviewing phone sessions or usual care. Co-primary outcomes were the LLT adherence (measured by Proportion of Days Covered (PDC); good adherence defined as PDC>80%), and LDL-C goal (<70 mg/dl or 50% reduction from baseline) achievement rate at one year. Results: In total, 360 patients (mean age 62 years, 81% male) were randomized. Overall, good adherence was positively associated with LDL-C goal achievement rate at one year. Median PDC was higher in the intervention group than the control group [0.92 (IQR, 0.82-1.00) vs. 0.86 (0.62-0.98); p = 0.03] while the intervention group had increased odds of good adherence (odds ratio: 1.76 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.62; p = 0.04). However, neither the LDL-C goal achievement rate (49.6% in the intervention vs. 44.9% in the control group; p = 0.49) nor clinical outcomes differed significantly between the two groups . Conclusions: ? multifaceted intervention improved LLT adherence in post-ACS patients without a significant difference in LDL-C goal attainment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available