4.7 Article

Revealing Gravitational Collapse in the Serpens G3-G6 Molecular Cloud Using Velocity Gradients

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 912, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abedb7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [AST 1816234]
  2. NASA [ATP AAH7546, TCAN 144AAG1967]
  3. Simons Foundation
  4. INSU/CNRS (France)
  5. MPG (Germany)
  6. IGN (Spain)
  7. [115-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the relative roles of turbulence, magnetic fields, and self-gravity in star formation, finding that the Serpens G3-G6 south clump is undergoing gravitational collapse at a certain density. The analysis shows that the magnetic field energy significantly exceeds kinetic and gravitational energy, suggesting that gravitational collapse could be successfully triggered in a supersonic and sub-Alfvenic cloud.
The relative role of turbulence, magnetic fields, and self-gravity in star formation is a subject of intensive debate. We present IRAM 30 m telescope observations of the (CO)-C-13 (1-0) emission in the Serpens G3-G6 molecular cloud and apply to the data a set of statistical methods. These include the probability density functions of column density and the velocity gradients technique. We combine our data with the Planck 353 GHz polarized dust emission observations and Hershel H-2 column density. We suggest that the Serpens G3-G6 south clump is undergoing a gravitational collapse. Our analysis reveals that the gravitational collapse happens at volume density n >= 10(3) cm(-3). We estimate the plane-of-the-sky magnetic field strength to be approximately 120 mu G using the traditional Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi method and 100 mu G using a new technique proposed in Lazarian et al (2020). We find that the Serpens G3-G6 south clump's total magnetic field energy significantly surpasses kinetic energy and gravitational energy. We conclude that the gravitational collapse could be successfully triggered in a supersonic and sub-Alfvenic cloud.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available