4.7 Article

Cosmic Velocity Field Reconstruction Using AI

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 913, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf3bb

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National SKA Program of China [2020SKA0110401]
  2. NSFC [11803094, 11803095, 11733010]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [202002030360]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2020R1I1A1A01073494]
  5. COLCIENCIAS [287-2016, 1204-712-50459]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1I1A1A01073494] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have developed a deep learning technique to infer the nonlinear velocity field from the dark matter density field. Their analysis shows that neural networks may have an overwhelming advantage over perturbation theory in reconstructing velocity or momentum fields.
We develop a deep-learning technique to infer the nonlinear velocity field from the dark matter density field. The deep-learning architecture we use is a U-net style convolutional neural network, which consists of 15 convolution layers and 2 deconvolution layers. This setup maps the three-dimensional density field of 32(3) voxels to the three-dimensional velocity or momentum fields of 20(3) voxels. Through the analysis of the dark matter simulation with a resolution of 2h (-1) Mpc, we find that the network can predict the the nonlinearity, complexity, and vorticity of the velocity and momentum fields, as well as the power spectra of their value, divergence, and vorticity and its prediction accuracy reaches the range of k similar or equal to 1.4 h Mpc(-1) with a relative error ranging from 1% to less than or similar to 10%. A simple comparison shows that neural networks may have an overwhelming advantage over perturbation theory in the reconstruction of velocity or momentum fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available