4.4 Article

Investigation of Apnea Testing During Brain Death Determination in China

Journal

ASAIO JOURNAL
Volume 67, Issue 11, Pages 1211-1216

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001385

Keywords

brain death; apnea; complication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apnea testing (AT) is a key step in brain death diagnosis in China, but completion rates are not ideal. This study analyzed completion rates of AT in potential BD patients from 2013 to 2019, finding lower rates in both adult and pediatric groups. Factors such as PaO2 and A-a gradient are crucial for successful completion of AT and should be optimized beforehand.
Apnea testing (AT) is one of the key steps for brain death (BD) diagnosis and confirmation. However, the completion rate of AT is not well in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the completion rates of the AT during BD determination in China and analyze the determinant factors. We reviewed and analyzed potential BD patients registered in our database from 2013 to 2019. The patients were divided into those with completed and aborted AT. Preconditions and organ function status were compared between the two groups. A total of 1,531 (1,301 adults and 230 pediatrics) cases of potential BD were extracted, and BD determination was performed 2,185 and 377 times in adults and pediatrics respectively. The nonperformance and aborted rates of AT were 12.2% and 34.5% in adults, and 11.7% and 44.4% in pediatrics respectively. Compared with the completed group, the aborted group had a lower PaO2, systolic blood pressure, PaO2/FiO(2) ratios, and higher alveolar-arterial (A-a) gradient both in adults and pediatrics, and higher PaCO2 and higher heart rates in adults. PaO2 and A-a gradient had higher predictive efficacy for AT completion in both adults and pediatrics. The implementation and completion rates of AT are not ideal in China. PaO2 and A-a gradient are important factors for the successful completion of AT and should be optimized before AT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available