4.5 Article

Heterologous expression of codon optimized Trichoderma reesei Ce16A in Pichia pastoris

Journal

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 107-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.07.004

Keywords

Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase II (Cel6A); Codon optimization; AOX1 and GAP promoter; Pichia pastoris; High cell density fed batch cultivation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20906041, 21176106]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571666, 2016T90419]
  3. Jiangsu Key Lab of Biomass-based Green Fuels and Chemicals [JSBGFC14006]
  4. Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province [2015JY0054]
  5. 111 Project [111-2-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Cel6A deficiency has become one of the limiting factors for cellulose saccharification in biochemical conversion of cellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. The work attempted to use codon optimization to enhance Trichoderma reesei Cel6A expression in Pichia pastoris. Two recombinants P. pastoris GS115 containing AOX1 and GAP promotors were successfully constructed, respectively. The optimal temperatures and pHs of the expressed Cel6A from two recombinants were consistent with each other, were also in the extremely similar range to that reported on the native Cel6A from T. reesei. Based on the shake flask fermentation, AOX1 promotor enabled the recombinant to produce 265 U/L and 300 mg/L of the Ce16A enzyme, and the GAP promotor resulted in 145 U/L and 200 mg/L. High cell density fed batch (HCDFB) fermentation significantly improved the enzyme titer (1100 UAL) and protein yield (2.0 g/L) for the recombinant with AOX1 promotor. Results have showed that the AOX1 promotor is more suitable than the GAP for the Cel6A expression in P. pastoris. And the HCDFB cultivation is a favorable way to express the Ce16A highly in the methanol inducible yeast. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available