4.7 Article

Integration of data across toxicity endpoints for improved safety assessment of chemicals: the example of carcinogenicity assessment

Journal

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages 1971-1993

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03035-x

Keywords

Chemical safety assessment; Systemic toxicity endpoint; Key characteristic; New approach methodology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This methodology integrates information from different systemic toxicity endpoints and new approach methodologies to evaluate hazard, with a focus on carcinogenicity assessment. By organizing information in a systematic way, it allows for a flexible and resource-efficient means of utilizing existing test methods and identifying where new methods can be integrated to fulfill regulatory requirements.
In view of the need to enhance the assessment of consumer products called for in the EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, we developed a methodology for evaluating hazard by combining information across different systemic toxicity endpoints and integrating the information with new approach methodologies. This integrates mechanistic information with a view to avoiding redundant in vivo studies, minimising reliance on apical endpoint tests and ultimately devising efficient testing strategies. Here, we present the application of our methodology to carcinogenicity assessment, mapping the available information from toxicity test methods across endpoints to the key characteristics of carcinogens. Test methods are deconstructed to allow the information they provide to be organised in a systematic way, enabling the description of the toxicity mechanisms leading to the adverse outcome. This integrated approach provides a flexible and resource-efficient means of fully exploiting test methods for which test guidelines are available to fulfil regulatory requirements for systemic toxicity assessment as well as identifying where new methods can be integrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available