4.1 Article

Ethical considerations for remote sensing and open data in relation to the endangered archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa project

Journal

ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 279-292

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/arp.1816

Keywords

archaeology; cultural heritage preservation; ethics; Middle East and North Africa; open data; remote sensing

Funding

  1. Arcadia Fund [4178]
  2. British Council Cultural Protection Fund [IMP-067-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The EAMENA project utilizes remote sensing techniques to rapidly document and assess archaeological and cultural heritage sites in the MENA region, making it one of the largest of its kind. This paper discusses important ethical issues related to remote-sensed archaeology and reflects on EAMENA's unique role in this subfield.
The UK-based Endangered Archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa (EAMENA) project uses remote sensing techniques to rapidly record and evaluate the status of archaeological and cultural heritage sites in the MENA region. Applying remote sensing methods to the archaeological landscapes of 20 countries, EAMENA is one of the largest documentation projects of its kind. Such a scope raises important ethical questions fundamental to the practice of remote-sensed archaeology, and this paper contributes to this discussion by reflecting on EAMENA's unique role in this subfield. We present ethical issues and possible solutions related to remote sensing and archaeology, drawing on models developed within the humanitarian aid sector and postcolonial archaeology. In addition, we consider issues of national sovereignty and their relationship to the engagement of local communities. Finally, this paper examines the roles of data openness and open access policies as ethical factors and how EAMENA has addressed these so far.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available