4.6 Review

Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As and MeHg) as risk factors for cognitive dysfunction: A general review of metal mixture mechanism in brain

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 203-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2016.09.016

Keywords

Metal toxicity; Metal mixture; Cognitive dysfunction; Hippocampus; Mode of actions

Funding

  1. European Union [603946]
  2. EuroMix (European Test and Risk Assessment Strategies for Mixtures) [633172]
  3. AGAUR
  4. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human exposure to toxic heavy metals is a global challenge. Concurrent exposure of heavy metals; such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As) and methylmercury (MeHg) are particularly important due to their long lasting effects on the brain. The exact toxicological mechanisms invoked by exposure to mixtures of the metals Pb, Cd, As and MeHg are still unclear, however they share many common pathways for causing cognitive dysfunction. The combination of metals may produce additive/synergetic effects due to their common binding affinity with NMDA receptor (Pb, As, MeHg), Na+ - K+ ATP-ase pump (Cd, MeHg), biological Ca+2 (Pb, Cd, MeHg), Glu neurotransmitter (Pb, MeHg), which can lead to imbalance between the pro-oxidant elements (ROS) and the antioxidants (reducing elements). In this process, ROS dominates the antioxidants factors such as GPx, GS, GSH, MT-III, Catalase, SOD, BDNF, and CERB, and finally leads to cognitive dysfunction. The present review illustrates an account of the current knowledge about the individual metal induced cognitive dysfunction mechanisms and analyse common Mode of Actions (MOAs) of quaternary metal mixture (Pb, Cd, As, MeHg). This review aims to help advancement in mixture toxicology and development of next generation predictive modd(such as PBPK/PD) combining both kinetic and dynamic interactions of metals. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available