4.7 Article

Experimental study on the impact of pressure ratio on temperature drop in a Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116653

Keywords

Ranque-Hilsch Vortex Tube; Experimental Data Consolidation; Pressure Ratio; Temperature Drop; Recovery Temperature; Recovery Factor

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental investigation on the Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube was conducted to study the effects of pressure magnitude, pressure drop, and pressure ratio on temperature drop. The study found that the temperature drop is best correlated to the ratio of the inlet and cold outlet pressures, suggesting a polytropic process.
An experimental investigation of a Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube has been performed. The investigation focuses on the effects that pressure magnitude, pressure drop and pressure ratio have on the temperature drop between the inlet and the cold outlet. The Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube used in the experiments was designed through consideration of a large body of experimental data consolidated from existing literature. Experiments are conducted for cases of constant cold exit pressure (0.31 [MPa]), constant pressure drop between the inlet and cold exit (0.31 [MPa]), and constant pressure ratio between the inlet and cold outlet (2.0). From the experimental data collected, the temperature drop was found to be best correlated to the ratio of the inlet and cold outlet pressures, suggesting that the process could be characterized as polytmpic. Results for each case were reported in terms of recovery temperature and static temperature to illustrate the importance of interpreting the dynamic component of temperature in the results. The reported results show that for a pressure ratio of 2.0, the maximum recovery temperature drop is 13.96 [K], whereas the corresponding static temperature drop is 12.25 [K].

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available