4.6 Article

Electrical spin-wave spectroscopy in nanoscale waveguides with nonuniform magnetization

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 118, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0045806

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. imec's industrial affiliate program on beyond-CMOS logic
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program within the FET-OPEN project CHIRON [801055]
  3. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) [1SB9121N, 1S05719N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spin wave modes in magnetic waveguides with width down to 320nm were studied using electrical propagating spin-wave spectroscopy and micromagnetic simulations under both longitudinal and transverse magnetic bias fields. The results showed a 1.3GHz wide spin-wave band for longitudinal bias fields, while transverse bias fields led to several distinct bands corresponding to different quantized width modes. Micromagnetic simulations revealed nonuniform and tilted magnetization in this geometry, resulting in spin wave dispersion relations in good agreement with experimental observations.
Spin wave modes in magnetic waveguides with the width down to 320nm have been studied by electrical propagating spin-wave spectroscopy and micromagnetic simulations for both longitudinal and transverse magnetic bias fields. For longitudinal bias fields, a 1.3GHz wide spin-wave band was observed in agreement with analytical dispersion relations for uniform magnetization. However, the transverse bias field led to several distinct bands, corresponding to different quantized width modes, with both negative and positive slopes. Micromagnetic simulations showed that, in this geometry, the magnetization was nonuniform and tilted due to the strong shape anisotropy of the waveguides. Simulations of the quantized spin-wave modes in such nonuniformly magnetized waveguides resulted in spin wave dispersion relations in good agreement with the experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available