4.6 Article

Dry reforming of methane over Ni-ZrOx catalysts doped by manganese: On the effect of the stability of the structure during time on stream

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 617, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2021.118120

Keywords

Dry reforming of methane; Manganese; Stable ZrO2; Redistribution; CO2

Funding

  1. CSC (China Scholarship Council)
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1501404]
  3. 111 program [B17030]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ni-Mn-ZrOx catalyst showed higher stability and activity in DRM reaction, while Ni-ZrOx catalyst exhibited decreased catalytic activity due to the instability of ZrO2 support leading to reduced surface nickel content and increased nickel particle size.
Ni-Mn-ZrOx catalyst prepared by a one-step urea hydrolysis method was tested in the dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction at medium temperature. The catalyst was characterized by H-2-TPR, CO2-TPD, XRD, XPS, TGA, Raman, and TEM. On Ni-Mn-ZrOx catalyst, the catalytic activity increased with time on stream, while a decrease was observed on Ni-ZrOx catalyst. In order to understand this phenomenon, the catalysts were characterized at pre-reaction and during reaction for different time on stream such as 100 min, 300 min, and 480 min. According to the XPS results, it was shown that the Zr species on Ni-ZrOx were reduced during the reaction, whereas the Zr species was almost in equilibrium on Ni-Mn-ZrOx catalyst. In combining the results of XRD and activity in DRM, we can conclude that a stable ZrO2 structure on Ni-Mn-ZrOx catalyst might promote the redox of nickel species during the reaction, and further promote the redistribution of nickel species. However, on the Ni-ZrOx catalyst, the unstable ZrO2 support might result in a decrease of surface nickel content while an increase of Ni particle size, thus led to a decrease of activity for DRM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available