4.5 Article

MONTE CARLO-BASED QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP MODELS FOR TOXICITY OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS TO DAPHNIA MAGNA

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 2691-2697

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3466

Keywords

Computational toxicology; Ecological risk assessment; Environmental toxicology; Aquatic toxicology; Organic contaminant

Funding

  1. European Commission [686141]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science, the Republic of Serbia [43012]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF/CREST HRD-0833178]
  4. EPSCoR [362492-190200-01/NSFEPS-090378]
  5. Division Of Human Resource Development
  6. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1547754] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Office Of The Director
  8. EPSCoR [0903787] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity of a large set of 758 organic compounds to Daphnia magna were built up. The simplified molecular input-line entry system (SMILES) was used to represent the molecular structure. The Correlation and Logic (CORAL) software was utilized as a tool to develop the QSAR models. These models are built up using the Monte Carlo method and according to the principle QSAR is a random event if one checks a group of random distributions in the visible training set and the invisible validation set. Three distributions of the data into the visible training, calibration, and invisible validation sets are examined. The predictive potentials (i.e., statistical characteristics for the invisible validation set of the best model) are as follows: n = 87, r(2) = 0.8377, root mean square error = 0.564. The mechanistic interpretations and the domain of applicability of built models are suggested and discussed. (C) 2016 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available