4.3 Article

Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 2157-2163

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14988

Keywords

Biweekly; TAS-102; neutropenia; bevacizumab; metastatic colorectal cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of biweekly TAS-102 with bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with mCRC. The results showed prolonged progression-free and overall survival, reduced incidence of grade 3 or more neutropenia, and maintained performance status for patients, making this combination a potential treatment option for late-stage mCRC receiving third-or later-line therapy.
Background: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) with bevacizumab combination therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods: We included 19 patients with mCRC who received TAS-102 and bevacizumab combination therapy biweekly as third-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Results: Patients had a median age of 73 years and most (73.4%) were men. The median progression-free and overall survival were 5.6 and 11.5 months, respectively. Five (26.3%) patients achieved a response and the disease control rate was 12/19 (63.1%). One patient (5.2%) experienced neutropenia grade 3 or more. The median time from baseline performance status 0/1 to worsening to 2 or more was 10.3 months. Conclusion: Biweekly TAS-102 plus bevacizumab facilitates tumor shrinkage by reducing the incidence of grade 3 or more neutropenia, improving survival, and maintaining performance status. This combination may represent a treatment option for patients with late-stage mCRC receiving third-or later-line therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available