4.2 Article

Into the Animal Mind: Perceptions of Emotive and Cognitive Traits in Animals

Journal

ANTHROZOOS
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 597-614

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2021.1914439

Keywords

Animal cognition; anthropomorphism; conservation; human– animal interaction; perception; wildlife

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) [435-2013-2017]
  2. Canada Research Chair Program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined public perceptions of animal minds across wildlife species, finding that people tend to attribute cognitive traits to animals more frequently than emotive traits. Mammals were perceived to have the highest levels of both cognitive and emotive capacities, followed by birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. The study suggests that perceptions of wildlife mental capabilities may be higher than traditionally believed.
As incidences of human-wildlife interaction escalate, it is useful to increase understanding of the perceptions that might underpin these interactions or explain human behavior so associated. This study sought to identify public perceptions of the animal mind across wildlife species and to examine how states or qualities such as conscious thinking and feeling are perceived. We also aimed to evaluate whether people anthropomorphize species as readily as is often postulated. Using an online survey of 2,342 participants from the United States, we characterized perceptions of 36 wildlife species. In doing so, we also sought to stabilize inconsistent terminology in previous animal mind studies, by characterizing and measuring attributions of two specific traits, which we categorized as cognitive and emotive. We found that people differentiate between cognitive traits (intellectual traits) and emotive traits (experiential, emotional states). Contrary to some past studies as well as popular assumptions, cognitive traits were ascribed more frequently than emotive traits for all animals. In addition, different animal classes were perceived as having varying levels of capacity of both traits. Mammals were ranked highest on qualities that defined both traits, followed by birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. The ranges within class also varied. Our findings provide new insights on how the public view the mental capabilities of wildlife species. The study further suggests that perceptions regarding the cognitive ability of animals may be higher than previously believed and that emotive traits may not be as notable as traditionally assumed. Elucidating these points may contribute to further progress in wildlife discussions and conservation strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available