4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Regional Variation in Treatment for Highest-Risk Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 1282-1290

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.067

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health [UL1TR001855, UL1TR000130]
  2. Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons
  3. American Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with multiple high-risk socioeconomic factors in non-small cell lung cancer experience disparities in treatment and survival, which vary by region.
BACKGROUND Non-small cell lung cancer patients with multiple high-risk socioeconomic factors experience treatment and survival disparities. We aim to assess whether disparities in treatment and survival vary by region for patients with 3 or more high-risk socioeconomic factors. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: standard treatment, nonstandard treatment, and no curative treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate regional differences in treatment. Cox proportional hazards regression and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival analysis. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS A total of 93,211 patients met inclusion criteria. For patients with 3 or more high-risk socioeconomic factors, the odds of nonstandard treatment were significantly greater in 6 regions compared with New England, greatest in West North Central (odds ratio 2.09, P < .001). The odds of no curative treatment were significantly greater in 7 regions compared with New England, greatest in West South Central (odds ratio 3.56, P < .001). West North Central was associated with the highest risk of all-cause mortality compared with New England (hazard ratio 1.10, P < .001), and Middle Atlantic was associated with the lowest (hazard ratio 0.86, P < .001). The 5-year overall survival was longest in Middle Atlantic (60.8%) and shortest in Mountain (36.8%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with 3 or more high-risk socioeconomic factors experience treatment and survival disparities across the United States, though disparities are more pronounced in certain regions. Regional interventions may help mitigate disparities among highest risk non-small cell lung cancer patients. (c) 2022 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available