4.5 Article

Current-use pesticides in seawater and their bioaccumulation in polar bear-ringed seal food chains of the Canadian Arctic

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1695-1707

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3427

Keywords

Current-use pesticide; Marine mammal; Food chain; Trophic dilution; Bioaccumulation

Funding

  1. Molson Foundation
  2. Northern Contaminants Program (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada)
  3. Environment Canada (Chemical Management Plan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of current-use pesticides (CUPs) in seawater and their trophodynamics were investigated in 3 Canadian Arctic marine food chains. The greatest ranges of dissolved-phase concentrations in seawater for each CUP were endosulfan sulfate (less than method detection limit (MDL) to 19pgL(-1)) > dacthal (0.76-15pgL(-1)) > chlorpyrifos (less than MDL to 8.1pgL(-1)) > pentachloronitrobenzene (less than MDL to 2.6pgL(-1)) > -endosulfan (0.20-2.3pgL(-1)). Bioaccumulation factors (BAFs, water-respiring organisms) were greatest in plankton, including chlorothalonil (log BAF=7.4 +/- 7.1 L kg(-1), mean +/- standard error), chlorpyrifos (log BAF=6.9 +/- 6.7 L kg(-1)), and -endosulfan (log BAF=6.5 +/- 6.0 L kg(-1)). The largest biomagnification factors (BMFs) were found for dacthal in the capelin:plankton trophic relationship (BMF=13 +/- 5.0) at Cumberland Sound (Nunvavut), and for -endosulfan (BMF=16 +/- 4.9) and -endosulfan (BMF=9.3 +/- 2.8) in the polar bearringed seal relationship at Barrow and Rae Strait (NU), respectively. Concentrations of endosulfan sulfate exhibited trophic magnification (increasing concentrations with increasing trophic level) in the poikilothermic portion of the food web (trophic magnification factor=1.4), but all of the CUPs underwent trophic dilution in the marine mammal food web, despite some trophic level-specific biomagnification. Together, these observations are most likely indicative of metabolism of these CUPs in mammals. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:1695-1707. (c) 2016 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available