Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation Evolution and Further Development of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations
Allison Hirst et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)
What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking
Sian Cousins et al.
BMJ OPEN (2019)
The need for transparency of clinical evidence for medical devices in Europe
Alan G. Fraser et al.
LANCET (2018)
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework
Mandeep Sekhon et al.
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2017)
Making the Leap: the Translation of Innovative Surgical Devices From the Laboratory to the Operating Room
Hani J. Marcus et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2016)
IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
Art Sedrakyan et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
Art Sedrakyan et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages
Peter McCulloch et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
Jonathan A. Cook et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages
Patrick L. Ergina et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Phase 0 clinical trials in oncology: a paradigm shift for early drug development?
Chris H. Takimoto
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2009)
Share Paper
