4.5 Article

THE TOXICITY OF CREOSOTE-TREATED WOOD TO PACIFIC HERRING EMBRYOS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS NEAR CREOSOTED PILINGS IN JUNEAU, ALASKA

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 1261-1269

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3653

Keywords

Aquatic toxicology; Environmental toxicology; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Water quality; Ecotoxicology Herring; Fish embryos; Creosote

Funding

  1. Alaska Department of Transportation
  2. Institute for Northern Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from creosote exposure in the laboratory resulted in deleterious effects in developing Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) embryos, and potentially toxic concentrations of PAHs were measured using passive water samplers at 1 of 3 harbor field sites in Juneau, Alaska, USA. Aqueous total PAH concentrations of 4.6 mu g/L and 8.4 mu g/L from creosote exposure resulted in skeletal defects and ineffective swimming in hatched larvae in the laboratory (10% effective concentrations) and were the most sensitive parameters measured. Hatch rates also suffered from creosote exposure in a dose-dependent manner: at exposures between 5 mu g/L and 50 mu g/L total PAH, 50% of the population failed to hatch. Comparisons between laboratory and field deployed passive samplers suggested that for at least 1 harbor in Juneau, concentrations sufficient to induce teratogenic effects were found directly on creosoted pilings, within 10 cm of them, and sometimes at a distance of 10 m. Total PAH concentrations generally decreased with distance from creosoted pilings. Creosote pilings contribute to the PAH load within a marina and can rise to PAH concentrations that are harmful to fish embryos, but at a scale that is localized in the environment. (C) 2016 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available