4.6 Article

A violent market price contract for agribusiness supply chain

Journal

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 315, Issue 2, Pages 1971-1996

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04068-2

Keywords

Supply chain risk management; Supply chain contracts; Agribusiness; Stackelberg game; Contract farming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contract farming is crucial for development in the agribusiness sector, but challenges may arise due to extreme market price fluctuations. A proposed solution is the VMP contract, which incentivizes parties to honor the contract even under adverse market conditions. Modeling and numerical illustrations show the benefits of the VMP contract in ensuring cooperation between firms and farmers.
A contract farming arrangement between a firm and a farmer is an important mechanism for development in the agribusiness sector. Among the major challenges of these arrangements are the violations of the contract by the parties under conditions of extreme market price fluctuations. To address this issue, we propose a violent market price (VMP) contract, which incentivises the firm and the farmer to remain in the contract even under extreme price fluctuation. In the VMP contract, we propose a pricing mechanism which adjusts the price based on adverse market conditions. We model the firm-farmer interaction as a Stackelberg game and derive the optimal contract parameters using backward induction. We establish that there is no incentive to deviate from the VMP contract. The sum of the expected profits of the firm and the farmer is found to be higher when both honour the VMP contract than when they violate. The individual rationality conditions for the firm and the farmer to enter into the contract are derived. The model is demonstrated through numerical illustrations based on case-study, and sensitivity analysis is performed to provide further insights.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available