4.8 Article

Superprotonic Conductivity of MOF-808 Achieved by Controlling the Binding Mode of Grafted Sulfamate

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 26, Pages 14334-14338

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202103191

Keywords

binding modes; metal– organic frameworks; MOF-808; proton conductivity; sulfamate

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [2016R1A5A1009405, 2019R1I1A1A01062148]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1I1A1A01062148] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By modulating the binding mode of the sulfamate moieties in a metal-organic framework, MOF-808-4SA-150 achieves superprotonic conductivity with a proton conductivity more than 30 times higher than MOF-808-4SA-60. The superprotonic conductivity is well maintained over 1000 cycles of measurements and for seven days of cyclic measurements.
A metal-organic framework (MOF) having superprotonic conductivity, MOF-808, is prepared by modulating the binding mode of the sulfamate (SA) moieties grafted onto the metal clusters. The activation of the SA-grafted MOF-808 at 150 degrees C changes the binding mode of the grafted SA from monodentate to bridging bidentate, thus converting the neutral amido (-S-NH2) moiety of the grafted SA to the more acidic cationic sulfiliminium (-S=NH2+) moiety. Further, the acidic sulfiliminium moiety of MOF-808-4SA-150 results in more efficient proton conduction than the amido moiety of MOF-808-4SA-60. At 60 degrees C and 95 % relative humidity, MOF-808-4SA-150 is found to have a proton conductivity of 7.89x10(-2) S cm(-1), which is more than 30-times higher than that of MOF-808-4SA-60. Moreover, this superprotonic conductivity is well maintained over 1000 cycles of conductivity measurements and for similar cyclic measurements each day for seven days.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available