4.8 Letter

Comment on The Nature of Chalcogen-Bonding-Type Tellurium-Nitrogen Interactions: Fixing the Description of Finite-Temperature Effects Restores the Agreement Between Experiment and Theory

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 24, Pages 13144-13149

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202102679

Keywords

finite-temperature effects; gas phase; molecular dynamics; non-covalent interactions; tellurium

Funding

  1. DFG [1807]
  2. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have discovered a molecule displaying a tellurium-nitrogen interaction, with structural data indicating an increase in the Te-N equilibrium distance. While some DFT calculations suggest a larger distance in gas phase, high-level calculations point to a smaller distance in the isolated molecule. This discrepancy may be attributed to incomplete description of finite-temperature effects.
Mitzel and co-workers recently presented an intriguing molecule displaying a tellurium-nitrogen interaction. Structural data obtained in the solid and in gas phase indicated a large increase of the Te-N equilibrium distance r(e) from 2.64 to 2.92 angstrom, respectively. Although some DFT calculations appear to support the large r(e) in gas phase, we argue that the lions share of the increase is due to an incomplete description of finite-temperature effects in the back-corrected experimental data. This hypothesis is based on high-level coupled-cluster (CC) and periodic DFT calculations, which consistently point towards a much smaller r(e) in the isolated molecule. Further support comes through MD simulations with a tuned GFN2-xTB Hamiltonian: Calibrated against a CC reference, these show a six-times larger influence of temperature than with the originally used GFN1-xTB. Taking this into account, the back-corrected r(e) in gas phase becomes 2.67 +/- 0.08 angstrom, in good agreement with high-level CC theory and most DFT methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available