Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube

The aim of this study was to assess the content, reliability and quality of information regarding testicular cancer in YouTube videos. The search was performed by using term 'testicular cancer' on YouTube, and the first 168 videos were listed according to relevancy. Video features and source of upload were recorded. The quality, reliability and accuracy of the information were evaluated by two independent urologists using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score, the 5-point modified DISCERN tool and the Global Quality Score (GQS). A total number of 152 videos were analysed. The most common source of upload was talk show programmes/TV programmes (25.7%), and majority of the content was about (24.3%) symptoms and diagnosis options. The mean JAMA score, modified DISCERN score and GQS were 1.59, 2.13 and 2.61 respectively. These scores were significantly higher in videos that were uploaded by physicians/nonprofit physicians/professional organisations/universities (p < 0.001). There is a positive correlation between the video length, DISCERN, JAMA scores and GQS. YouTube is a widely used source of information and advice about testicular cancer, but much of the content is of poor quality.

Automated summary

The study assessed the content, reliability and quality of information regarding testicular cancer in YouTube videos. The results showed that videos uploaded by physicians/nonprofit physicians/professional organisations/universities had significantly higher quality scores, indicating a positive correlation between video length, DISCERN and JAMA scores and GQS. YouTube is a widely used source for information about testicular cancer, but much of the content is of poor quality.