4.7 Review

Review: Multiplexed profiling of biomarkers in extracellular vesicles for cancer diagnosis and therapy monitoring

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338633

Keywords

Extracellular vesicles; Multiplex analysis; Biosensors; Cancer diagnosis; Therapy monitoring

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21627806, 21635004, 21705018]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFF0108606]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242017K3DN11, 2242020K40030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoscale vesicles secreted by cells, containing biomarkers closely related to the original cells, tumor occurrence, and development. Accurate detection of EV biomarkers is crucial for noninvasive disease diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoscale vesicles secreted by normal and pathological cells. The types and levels of surface proteins and internal nucleic acids in EVs are closely related to their original cells, tumor occurrence, and development. Thus, the sensitive and accurate detection of EV biomarkers is a reliable approach for noninvasive disease diagnosis and treatment response monitoring. However, the purification and molecular profiling of these EVs are technically challenging. Much effort has been dedicated to developing new methods for the detection of multiple EV biomarkers. In this review, we summarize the recent progress in EV protein and nucleic acid biomarker analysis. Additionally, we systematically discuss the advantages of multiplexed EV biomarker detection for accurate cancer diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and cancer screening. This article aims to present an overview of all kinds of analytical technologies for assessing EVs and their applications in clinical settings. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available