4.5 Article

An evolutionary system of mineralogy, Part IV: Planetesimal differentiation and impact mineralization (4566 to 4560 Ma)

Journal

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages 730-761

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am-2021-7632

Keywords

Classification; mineral evolution; planetesimals; non-chondrite meteorites; iron meteorites; stony-iron meteorites; achondrites; differentiation; shock minerals

Funding

  1. Deep Carbon Observatory
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. W.M. Keck Foundation
  4. John Templeton Foundation
  5. NASAAstrobiology Institute ENIGMAteam
  6. Carnegie Institution for Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses two stages of planetesimal mineralogy that occurred early in the history of the solar nebula, including primary igneous minerals and impact mineralization. These stages mark the first time that high pressures played a significant role in mineral evolution.
The fourth installment of the evolutionary system of mineralogy considers two stages of planetesimal mineralogy that occurred early in the history of the solar nebula, commencing by 4.566 Ga and lasting for at least 5 million years: (1) primary igneous minerals derived from planetesimal melting and differentiation into core, mantle, and basaltic components and (2) impact mineralization resulting in shock-induced deformation, brecciation, melting, and high-pressure phase transformations. We tabulate 90 igneous differentiated asteroidal minerals, including the earliest known occurrences of minerals with Ba, Cl, Cu, F, and V as essential elements, as well as the first appearances of numerous phosphates, quartz, zircon, and amphibole group minerals. We also record 40 minerals formed through high-pressure impact alteration, commencing with the period of asteroid accretion and differentiation. These stages of mineral evolution thus mark the first time that high pressures, both static and dynamic, played a significant role in mineral paragenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available